THE FADED SPOTLIGHT

by Michael Lawrence

List of "M" Movies


The Man in the Moon (1991) Poster
THE MAN IN THE MOON (1991) A–
dir. Robert Mulligan

Summers stretched on forever in Louisiana in the 1950s. The air and humidity didn’t just seem heavy. They seemed to press down hard enough to make front porches look like they were sagging. The people were polite. Conversations moved slowly. Words always seemed to get trapped between the throat and the humidity. The only things that never knew when to shut up were the cicadas.

Reese Witherspoon is explosive here in her screen debut. She plays Dani. Fourteen, barefoot, always smacking gum as though it can barely divert her internal restlessness. On an otherwise uneventful day, she meets the boy next door, Court Foster (Jason London). She mistakes him at first for a trespasser, but he’s really the new neighbor. She’s incredulous at first. But his charm works on her. And that’s plenty. She’s in. Captivated. She falls in love. Subsequently, they spend a handful of summer afternoons together—small errands, shared glances. Her crush grows, but he clearly never sees her as a romantic possibility. And thank goodness for that, because she’s far too young, and he lets that be known. He calls her “kid”—affection and dismissal in the same breath—and every time he says it, you can see her trying to hear something else in the word. Some hidden meaning that never arrives.

Then Court’s attention drifts to Maureen, Dani’s older sister, home from school and suddenly the center of every conversation. They start to see each other. That’s not betrayal, though. It’s gravity. It’s the way things should be. The way they have to be. But that doesn’t stop Dani from feeling that the whole world is tilting away from her. You can feel how that lump forms in her throat.

Sam Waterston turns in one of his more notable career performances as their father—a man who seems like he’s been living his life by following instructions. He’s rigid, dutiful, exact. You can see how deeply it hurts when those rules suddenly stop making sense. That he has no idea how to adjust. (This manifests in an unforgettable scene when he reduces himself to slapping Dani on the cheek—a heated moment he instantly regrets.) Tess Harper plays their mother, who seems to keep her household running just through sheer force of will. She can’t fix anything. Her love is maintenance.

And then comes the tragedy. It’s quick. The kind of accident that happens in a heartbeat and is so arbitrary it feels like a gust of wind should have prevented it. You don’t even believe it happened at first. But it changes everything.

Robert Mulligan directs this film like a man observing it all from one porch over. Close enough to hear the arguments, too polite to interfere with them. His approach is patient and methodical. He’s even alert to the small gestures people give that pass for affection.

A quietly powerful film that I found completely absorbing—especially in the way it sneaks up on you and stays. The tragedy doesn’t feel staged. It feels remembered. In the moments after the movie ended, I found myself looping that moment endlessly through my head. Like I do with tragedies I actually lived through. From far away, The Man in the Moon looks small. Really, most movies look small when you consider that they’re stories about people you’ll never meet, and in most cases, not even about people who ever existed. But if you let yourself get close to them, like this movie makes so easy to do, they’re liable to pull you under. This is a movie I didn’t just watch. I fell into its beautiful, aching, and unforgettable spell.

Starring: Reese Witherspoon, Sam Waterston, Tess Harper, Gail Strickland, Jason London, Emily Warfield.
Rated PG-13. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. USA. 99 mins.
Man of La Mancha (1972) Poster
MAN OF LA MANCHA (1972) D+
dir. Arthur Hiller

Man of La Mancha started life as a Broadway hit—a story of impossible dreams, sung using impossible notes, and a knight convinced he could reach both. The musical was built on the bones of Cervantes—or at least the parts that sang best. The songs were huge, heart-soaked things that stuck with you long after. This movie adaptation, on the other hand, is a complete wreck. Faithful enough to the page, but deaf to the music in its veins.

On paper, it should’ve worked. Peter O’Toole as Don Quixote—the nobleman who is known for mistaking windmills for giants and shaving basins for magic helmets. Sophia Loren as Aldonza, the battered scullery maid who he believes to be the saintly Dulcinea. O’Toole and Loren are of course both acting legends—ones that any decent casting director would tell you were ideal for these roles.

But then they start to sing. And how should I put this lightly? They are terrible. Not even close. The Man of La Mancha is not a score that lets you fake it. It needs lungs, power, and belief. O’Toole and Loren have plenty of charisma when they’re talking, but the minute the orchestra swells, they both disappear. The glorious melodies crumble under their helm. And when you listen to them sing, you start wishing that Arthur Hiller had just adapted the book instead.

The framing device—Cervantes performing his own story inside the prison—worked onstage. It felt like you were watching actors transform into characters right in front of you. But on film, it’s more like dead weight. When the fantasy should really be taking hold of you, the movie keeps dragging you back to that prison. It worked in the play, because you never completely saw the fantasy take shape. It was always a prison.

The only thing that does really work in this movie is James Coco as Sancho Panza. He can do more than carry a tune. He gives the songs a face, a mood. The kind the role needs—warm, a little wobbly. He sings like he’s grinning through the melody, checking to see if you’ll grin back. The cruel irony is noted here. A sidekick who walks away with a movie built for legends. And he didn’t even want to.

A smaller complaint: the makeup. O’Toole’s transformation from Cervantes into Quixote is meant to mark the shift from playwright to mad knight. However, the makeup is so heavy that his face looks like something between a Halloween mask and kabuki. He’s not so much a dreamer as a wax figure in search of a ventilator.

There are moments when you can almost imagine what this movie could have been—especially if you’re familiar with the source material and you know how beautiful and funny it is and how it aches. But it just never breaks through. I wouldn’t say the dream is unreachable. It’s just that here, they missed it by miles.

Starring: Peter O’Toole, Sophia Loren, James Coco, Harry Andrews, Rosalie Crutchley, Brian Blessed, Ian Richardson.
Rated PG. United Artists. USA. 132 mins.
Man of the House (2005) Poster
MAN OF THE HOUSE (2005) D
dir. Stephen Herek

The setup should’ve been enough to sell itself. Tommy Lee Jones is in full permanent scowl as a Texas Ranger who gets the unenviable assignment to protect a squad of cheerleaders who’ve witnessed a murder. A solid enough premise that combines fish-out-of-water comedy with procedural spoof. And you’d think someone could’ve found a few decent laughs in there. But you’d think wrong.

Jones does what he always does. A man with deadpan authority, a quiet disgust, and a look on his face that he’d rather be anywhere else. You can sense each one of the cheerleaders’ glitter-coated offenses hitting against him like a personal betrayal. There’s also a certain rhythm to the way he barks tactical orders at a group of peppy college girls. It’s just not a funny one.

And the bulk of the reason for that is the cheerleaders aren’t really characters. They’re more like stock reactions in crop tops. They flirt, they giggle, they toss out slang that probably sounded dated before the movie even opened. The movie wants to keep reminding us that they’re supposed to be charming. But they aren’t. There’s not much charm to be found in scenes where everyone’s shrieking, saying something stupid, or—as is often the case here—doing both at once.

Every now and then, the movie remembers there’s a plot it’s supposed to be shepherding. There’s a murder. A couple of chases. A bad guy with no real purpose. The girls are meant to be in hiding, but they keep sneaking off to nightclubs. Trouble follows. But none of it really matters. The action’s flat. The suspense is thinner than the gloss on their lipstick.

Man of the House might have been a decent comedy of contrasts, but what we get instead is a comedy of confused noise. Jones doesn’t embarrass himself. How could he when all he was asked to do was his generic performance? But you can sense the gears in his mind grinding. He’s doing his job. Everyone else involved is just doodling.

Starring: Tommy Lee Jones, Christina Milian, Paula Garcés, Monica Keena, Vanessa Ferlito, Cedric the Entertainer, Anne Archer, Brian Van Holt.
Rated PG-13. Columbia Pictures. USA. 100 mins.
Man on Fire (2004) Poster
MAN ON FIRE (2004) B
dir. Tony Scott

The fire’s already gone out of John Creasy (Denzel Washington) when we meet him. A former CIA operative, now a wreck running on fumes and regret. The bottle and a conscience that won’t shut up are his only constants. He’s offered a job guarding the young daughter of a wealthy—if slightly shady—Mexico City businessman. Her name is Pita (Dakota Fanning, who puts in a performance that’s bright-eyed and sharp). Creasy accepts, but it’s not out of duty. It’s more like vacancy. Something to fill the hours between breakdowns.

At first, Creasy barely looks at her. He drinks. He glowers. He lets the silence do the work. The girl’s an assignment. A paycheck in pigtails. Something to protect, not to know. But Pita doesn’t do quiet. She prods, she pushes, she won’t disappear. And little by little, he gives way. The man who’s been circling the drain starts to remember what it felt like to care. He lets his guard down long enough to forget he’s supposed to feel nothing.

That’s when she’s taken. Snatched in broad daylight, right under his protection. He’s shot trying to defend her. Left bleeding, barely alive. When he awakens, the world feels colder. Emptied out. In the same way he recognizes from before he met Pita. That he used to drown in whiskey. But this time, he’s not going to drink it away. He’s going to reload.

What follows, on paper, looks like a basic procedural. We’ve got a botched ransom, there are dirty cops involved, a serviceably twisty plot. But the camera seems like it’s synced to Creasy’s pulse. It jerks, flares, and vibrates. Every heated interrogation Creasy conducts and every bullet he lobs seems like it’s personal. He isn’t chasing justice. He’s chasing faith. That if he fights hard enough, if he believes he can succeed, he can remake the world. More specifically, that Pita will get to live the life she deserves, even if it costs him everything else.

The plot mechanics aren’t special, but Washington and Fanning make this movie feel about as personable and mythic as could be expected in an improbable action-thriller. They bring the kind of human connection that can turn even a rote revenge movie into something that feels like it matters. Creasy is a man who was once lost in his own wreckage and wakes up just long enough to feel it when he loses everything again. And in those ruins, he finds purpose and redemption.

Starring: Denzel Washington, Dakota Fanning, Marc Anthony, Radha Mitchell, Christopher Walken, Giancarlo Giannini, Mickey Rourke, Rachel Ticotin.
Rated R. 20th Century Fox. USA. 146 mins.